The question crossed my mind
during a cursory visit to a tribal village in the hilly forested regions of North Tripura , last year.
The statistics available with the district authorities suggest, majority of 2300 people in Noagang are living below poverty line. The ratio is nearly double the State average of 40 per cent.
The statistics available with the district authorities suggest, majority of 2300 people in Noagang are living below poverty line. The ratio is nearly double the State average of 40 per cent.
But, take a sneak peek into the Mizo
village, and you will spot dish antennas in abundance. Many own two-wheelers
and, some have cars. Mobile phones are a common occurrence. Large number of
village boys are studying or working across the country.
And, many work abroad, mostly in West Asia . Their family members throng the Panchyat
office, every Saturday, to avail the video-conferencing facility – that was commissioned
under a centrally sponsored rural connectivity project – to keep in touch with the
near and dear ones, ‘free-of-cost’.
Politics of poverty
Surely, Noagang is not as poor,
as is told. And, it may not be an isolated case.
Murguma Dam |
And, that’s an open secrete in
rural India, where Panchyat’s are now brimming with activity to cater the
increasing demand for income certificates, BPL card and the schemes aimed at
270 million people, reportedly reeling under abject poverty.
I had an opportunity to revisit the
issue, a couple of weeks ago, while attending public hearings conducted by Welthungerhilfe
(WHH) of Germany at Jhalda-II block of Purulia, in West Bengal, to check the status
of Public Distribution System (PDS) aimed at the poor.
Rural Purulia records higher level
of poverty (44 per cent) than Tripura. And, the hilly and forested regions of Jhalda
are considered one of the poorest.
But, if your eyes don’t betray
you, Murguma in Begunkodor Panchyat doesn’t fit into this category.
Long way to go. Majidih. |
Definitely, there are poors in
Murguma. But, they should be a minority. The neatly lined up houses,
with motor-cycles and television antennas showing up here and there, tells the story of relative affluence.
with motor-cycles and television antennas showing up here and there, tells the story of relative affluence.
Inflated BPL list
Yet, all but one in a group of
approximately 20 - that gathered to share their experience on the PDS or Ration
(as is referred locally) - were enjoying weekly supply of hugely subsidised provisions,
meant for the poorest.
On offer are rice at `2 a kg, flour or Atta at ` 6.66 a kg and, kerosene at ` 16.10 a litre – approximately 70-90
per cent discount to their respective market price.
And, among this surprisingly overwhelming
majority of BPL population, only one family of Fulmani Mahato was landless! ‘Poverty’ plays an equaliser here.
Difference in scale
notwithstanding, the distortion of fact is visible in almost every village. Majidih
is evidently poorer than Murguma. But, that does not justify inclusion of
almost everyone in the BPL category.
Murguma |
The ration shop at Majidih, for
example, gets mere 70 per cent of the scheduled requirement of 60 quintal of
rice and 22 quintal Atta. The availability of Kerosene is even less.
The poor suffers
The advantage goes to Rabindar Besra,
who has a job as well as landed property to support the family but enjoys the
same amount of benefits as Bikna Munda or Parul Majhi, who has neither.
Simply put, pruning the BPL list
may help the government in reaching more benefits to the needy. But, that needs the politics to shift gear
from its current practices.
And, till that happens one may
draw some inspiration from Hensla - a cluster of 100 odd households of Kuiry
community – under Usti Panchyat in Jhalda-I block.
The village has recorded impressive
increase in farm productivity in the last decade, by adopting intensive
cropping techniques and a shoft in cropping pattern under the guidance of a
non-profit organisation, PRADAN.
Hensla |
Some solace
Yet, last year nearly 90 families
here installed sanitary toilets at government support that is meant for the poorest.
The only solace is: they have given up their distasteful habit of open
defecation.
Surely, even miss-directed policies
may end up in achieving larger goals.
***
(Pix by author)
We do have poor. Economics shows rich can become richer if poor become poorer. While your point of dish antennas, mobiles etc does show they are not in abject poverty, I think they are still poor by modern standards. A rickshawallah having a mobile does raise eyebrows. Similarly, a maid watching a tv serial in a color tv can cause amazement. On the other hand, well to do families have cars mobiles and servants for all members. Perhaps as you indicate in your post, it's time to redefine poverty. As a country we do possess resources to take care a lot of those problems caused by poverty.
ReplyDelete