Pratim Ranjan Bose
Love him or hate him, Narendra
Damodardas Modi surely made the ensuring Lok Sabha elections in India, money’s
worth.
With another week to go before
the one and a half month long election season comes to an end; there is no
point in hazarding a guess on the poll prospect of Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP).
Source www.toonpool.com |
But, the party’s decision to
project Modi as its prime ministerial nominee surely served a purpose to Indian
democracy, by forcing the electorate to take a stand rather than play the role
of a passive observer and, blame the political administration for failing the
nation.
Single minded focus on Modi
The ball was set rolling by
Modi’s critics. Instead of coming out with a credible plan to address the
public grievance against unprecedented corruption during the Congress-Led UPA (United
Progressive Alliance) rule and ensure growth; they focussed energy on Modi bashing.
“It will be disastrous for the
country to have Narendra Modi as the Prime Minister,” said India ’s economist
Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh - who is often accused of maintaining silence on
the mounting allegations against his government – in January.
And, since then the General
Election of 2014, became Modi-fied. Socialists, Leftists and even some rank opportunists (who are known for switching allegiance between a Congress-led UPA
and BJP-led National Democratic Alliance depending on immediate political
needs) - took anti-Modi stance.
Source: Theglobalpundit.blogspot.com |
Tons of newsprint was spent in
either disproving a ‘Gujarat model of growth’
or or painting a demonic picture of a reasonably popular politician, who has own
successive elections in his home State and is idolised by industry for
delivering able governance.
The trap of negative
politics
It was negative politics and was
done in complete oblivion to the fact that the Indian electorate is mature enough
to understand that Gujarat is not India . Also, whosoever comes to
power in Delhi ;
has to speak in the language of 1.2 billion that includes the world’s second
largest Muslim population among other things.
Even the start-up, Aam Aadmi
Party that caught the fancy of the nation’s youth by declaring a war against a
corruption, fell into this trap.
Source: rulzwithatul.blogspot.com |
The nation perhaps lost an
opportunity to witness the much needed rise of a social democratic force – that
would pay attention on ensuring a more equitable growth in capitalist regime,
rather than referring to political ideologies that has little relevance to an
upwardly mobile electorate.
BJP escaped criticism
Looking back, BJP gained
profusely by this opposition led “Modi-Wave”
As the debate circled around the
Chief Minister of Gujarat ; his party escaped
the public glare on its patchy record in governance in states like Karnataka and
Rajasthan.
The billion dollar iron ore
mining scam of a former Yeddyurappa government in Karnataka; the alleged
corruption in privatisation of State-owned companies by Atal Bihari Vajpayee government
during the NDA rule in the Centre (1998-2004) – everything fell by the wayside.
Discussions hovered around the perceived, yet unsubstantiated, role of Gujarat government during the post-Godhra riot in Ahmedabad
in 2002.
Source: India Today |
The opportunity was seized by
Modi. He enjoyed every bit of the personal attack and responded to it blow by
blow, perhaps a little more than that. As the poll season progressed, his speeches
and the style of campaigning went on improving.
Modi magic
What was initially an attack on
the Nikamma Sarkar (useless government) in Delhi ; changed in both colour and context.
Modi became more lethal; taking on the “ma-bete ki sarkar (Sonia and Rahul
Gandhi)” in Delhi
or a “changed Didi (Mamata Banerjee)” in Kolkata, at equal ease.
And, in a significant difference
to his opponents, his attacks were more political than personal.
Armed with fine oratory skill and
an ice-cool head, Modi simply tore apart his opposition by setting the course
of the debate. Every shot that was fired at him, boomeranged. The more his opponents lost their temper, the
more he appeared invincible.
If Priyanka Gandhi accused him of
pursuing “neech rajniti” (low-level of politics), Modi used it as an
opportunity to point out that taking kickbacks on toilet papers procured for athletes during the 2010 Commonwealth
Games; were indeed not the best examples of Indian politics.
The damage was not restricted to
Congress. Modi used the opportunity to crack the codes of Dalit (formerly
untouchables in Hindu religion) vote bank - jealously guarded by Mayawati’s
Bahujan Samaj Party - by flashing his neech (low) caste identity.
Surely his opponents haven’t done
enough homework on Modi. But Modi did study his opposition. And, it was apparent
time and again throughout this campaign phase.
Treading into new frontiers
A case in point is West Bengal,
where the party got a mere 3.5 per cent vote in 2009 (excepting Darjeeling that it won at
the support of GJM). No top-order BJP leader had ever wasted much time on this state.
But, Modi made a difference.
He not merely addressed a record
seven meetings here, in last one month but, put the ruling Trinamool Congress on
the back foot; by raising the sensitive issues of Ponzi scam and potential political
cover granted to illegal immigrants from Bangladesh.
And, when the West Bengal Chief
Minister, Mamata Banerjee angrily responded to his criticism; Modi mocked
at her and advised medical attention.
Source: dnasyndication.com |
“Didi is getting a bit too
angry. Doctors must take care so that she does not fall ill,” he advised,
before signing off his poll campaign in the State.
It is now to be seen how the
voters respond to this debate.
***
Although I don't like him, we have to admit Modi beat everybody else in electioneering. He has been all pervasive, omnipresent and almost universal. Nobody can say they did not see him. Next Friday will prove whether the old rhetoric of "jo dikhta hai wohi bikta hai" is still relevant or not. Thanks to the writer of this post for bringing to attention a few things which tend to be quickly forgotten after polls.
ReplyDeleteThanks Kumar
Delete