Wednesday 31 December 2014

Fueling public expectation on India's growth prospects in 2015 may prove deadly

Pratim Ranjan Bose

By all means 2014 was eventful.
The corruption-ridden Manmohan Singh government of Congress-led coalition suffered a humiliating defeat in May. The mandate was not merely against Congress – that had suffered its worst ever defeat – but, also against the coalition politics. 
Frustrated with the prolonged policy paralysis at the Centre; the young India – cutting across the religious divide - reposed faith on one of the most controversial characters of Indian politics. Narendra Modi’s BJP came to power with a single party majority - a feat last achieved by Congress in 1984 election.

Fair job so far

A fair assessment will tell that the Modi government hasn’t done badly either, during the last seven months in office.
At least two major schemes (Swachh Bharat Aviyan  and Jan Dhan Yojna ) were rolled out to address long pending issues in public health and hygiene and, financial inclusion.
I am sure together they will impact life of 800 million rural Indians like never before, helping create a wider and stronger market place.

The task cut out for the new government was an extremely uphill one on the economic front.
Coal sector –fuelling 72 per cent of India’s electricity demand – was in a mess. Supreme Court cancelled allotment of nearly 200 captive coal blocks. Some 40,000 MW worth of electricity generation capacities attracting close to $ 33 bn bank finance are either stranded due to lack of fuel or suffering from low demand.
Gas sector was mired in controversy on pricing issues. Road, port and rail infrastructure projects were in jeopardy. Gross irregularities left iron ore sector grasping for breath and the country was meeting demand through imports. As a spin-off effect, the banking sector was full with sticky assets.
Having assumed office, Modi revised the previous government’s decision to double the natural gas prices to an abnormal high of $8.4 per million metric British thermal unit (mmBtU) . The gas producers are now offered 33 per cent hike to $ 5.61 per mmBtU that is in sync with the price of imported liquefied natural gas (LNG).
Exercises are on to create mechanism for distributing the coal assets in a transparent manner as ordered by the apex court. State owned mining companies were asked to tighten belt and grow faster to meet demand of either iron ore or coal.
On the policy front, foreign investment limits are raised in insurance sector and the Land Acquisition Act was relaxed to pave way for faster implementation of the infrastructure projects.

Associated controversies

The initiatives were not free from controversies either. At least three major decisions involving opening upof the country’s coal sector to private competition; FDI limit in insurance and amending the Land Acquisition Act; were taken through ordinances.
An ordinance is a law that is enforced subject to be ratified by the Parliament at within a stipulated period. The practice is not recommended unless in urgency. To add fuel to the fire thegovernment re-promulgated some of the ordinances (as in coal) invitingcriticism from the Opposition of indulging in undemocratic practices 
While the government blames Opposition for creating roadblock for due discussion on economic issues in the Parliament; the truth is, BJP should blame its ultra-Hindu nationalist affiliate groups for diverting attention from the growth agenda.

While the future will tell how BJP tackles these groups and ensures rule of law that is most important for economic growth; it is time for Modi government to take a more level headed view on the country’s growth prospects in the immediate future, else we may end up in another set of troubles.

Don’t promise the moon

Looking back the Manmohan Singh government had run into rough weather by trying to ride the popular aspirations, way back in 2004-05. In an effort to make the most of the prevailing high growth regime, the government took a series of hasty decisions be it in allotting coal blocks, telecom spectrum or setting up power plants.
As they came back for a second term (2009-14) all of those decisions blew up on their face. Worse, the entire country paid for such actions.
Modi came to power promising growth at a time when the world economy was in a topsy-turvy and Indian economy was in serious trouble.
It was commendable that he started taking corrective measures to bring the economy back on the rails resulting an upward revision in projected growth from 4.7% to 5.5% in 2014-15.
But the environment is clearly not conducive for as high growth, as the government is expecting in 2015-16. The Economist cautioned that the world economy, led by the US, may be heading for tough times in 2015. The Reserve Bank of India too toed a similar line in its recent financial outlook. 
Modi must appreciate that the recent improvement in India’s growth outlook are a result of record drop in crude prices in barely six months.
  
The credit goes to OPEC’s decision to run American Shale oil producers out of business by pumping more crude. But no one knows where OPEC is going to put a stop. No one knows either, if another war will break out in the West Asia or some rebels will blow out an oil installation.
The bottomline is, a slight jump in crude prices will see India grappling with host of issues – starting from the capital account deficit. And if the crisis deepens, as in 2008, RBI says the Indian banking sector will not be free from trouble.
We are living in difficult times. The country will be obliged to Narendra Modi if readies India for reaping long term benefits. Fueling public expectations on short term gains, may prove deadly.


***