Tuesday 30 April 2019

West Bengal may witness a re-run of 2009, in 2019 Lok Sabha election with Opposition voters taking united stand against Trinamool


Pratim Ranjan Bose

Lok Sabha Elections 2019, may probably have the most interesting outcome in West Bengal.
For a State which is known for giving too long a rope to the ruling party; 2019 should be different. And, that would be a major shocker not only for the ruling Trinamool but also for a large section of mainstream media, which kept a blind eye to the changing public mood.
To my understanding, the 2019 election may be a near re-run of the 2009 Lok Sabha Election, when the TMC-led Opposition got 26 seats compared to 15 of the ruling CPI(M)-led Left Front. Left got 35 seats in the previous (2004) election. Trinamool got 34 in 2014.
In 2009, Opposition parties entered seat-share arrangement to ensure a bipolar contest. In 2019, the parties are divided, but their supporters appear to be united against TMC and resorting to strategic voting. BJP is getting votes as a strategic alternative.
Add to this, the general consolidation of Hindu votes to BJP; definite preference of young voters to Modi over Mamata; split of 28 per cent Muslim votes (which Trinamool considered its preserve) to various stakeholders including BJP (particularly in Birbhum and Coochbehar) on local or national considerations and; stern management by the Election Commission – this election may throw many surprises.
As per my estimates, which is drawn on inputs received from multiple sources, including on-ground assessment; of the 18 seats polled till phase-IV (May 29); 8 to 11 seats might have gone to BJP. Congress may have bagged 3 to 4; and Trinamool Congress, which came to power in 2011, is having anything between 4 to 6.
Trinamool may have suffered a near wash-out in first three phases of polling when North Bengal went to polls and is making amends in South Bengal, where it surely has a stronger support base and better poll machinery.
As for methodology, I have been armed with constituency-wise pre-election and post-election analytics which takes care of the trends, momentum, last minute electoral engineering by parties and last but not the least the public mood, which I believe is getting stronger against Trinamool.
West Bengal has 42 seats. So, a lot of polling is yet to be held. Trinamool will do better in South Bengal. They may also emerge as the single largest party in terms of seat-share, in a four-corner poll. But, the trend is probably set.
If we remember the past trends, dramatic rise of the Opposition in Parliamentary election generally set the course for change in State government in the following Assembly election; and whosoever was out of power, rarely came back.
The only exception to this rule was in 1989 when Congress failed to farther the major lead it got in 1984. However, the 1984 election was an exception too. 
Meanwhile, for the first time, Chief Minister Mamata Bannerjee’s rallies are failing to attract too many people. On the contrary, Prime Minister Narendra Modi is proving a crowd-puller.
On April 29, Modi held two meetings in the same district. Each rally was attended by 1-1.5 lakh people. For many reasons than one, there was little prospect of mobilizing this large crowd from far away destinations.
The symptoms are clear: Trinamool Congress is facing an anti-incumbency wave and is losing its iron grip on voters. There were very few one-sided acts of violence by the ruling party in the last four phases of the poll. Each such action was retaliated by Opposition supporters with equal measure.
Party insiders admit this. After the fourth phase, a top poll-manager of Trinamool predicted, in close quarters, that BJP might get 15 seats. Till last week, he was not ready to give BJP more than 10 seats.
It is surprising how mainstream media missed this trend, while digital and social media is full of loud hints.
***
Tweet: @pratimbose

Friday 26 April 2019

Sadhvi Praggya, Hindu terror and the outcry of the intellectuals


Pratim Ranjan Bose

Ever since BJP nominated her to contest from Bhopal Lok Sabha Constituency in Madhya Pradesh; Sadhvi Praggya became a fodder of the news media.
While Sadhvi is definitely adding to the controversy by her variety of comments; bulk of the news is on her alleged involvement in a terror act against Muslims.
The main allegations under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), 1999, were dropped due to lack of evidence. And, Sadhvi was released on bail after eight years in jail.
Nevertheless, she is under constant fire from media and intellectuals, who willy-nilly treat her as a terrorist - a Hindu terrorist, to be more precise.   
I am no admirer of Sadhvi Praggya or her selection by the BJP to contest in polls. I am also not contesting allegations leveled on her by the police. But I am tempted to ask, if such acts of social ostracisation, mobilizing public opinion against her, are ideal and, if such acts will yield the desired goal of secularism.
A little search on the net will throw up plenty of newspaper reports, referring MCOCA as a “draconian” law. There are also plenty of references identifying gross abuse of power and violation of human rights by police to MCOCA accused.  
It is now known that Praggya was subjected to the worst form of police torture leading to partial immobility. It is also known that the country’s apex court had time and again warned against taking statements “extracted” by police on face value. The courts are now careful to demand adequate proof.
More importantly, police torture always attracted severe criticism from the intellectuals. Books, media reports demonizing police sold like hotcakes.
Runu Guha Niyogi, a former officer of Kolkata police was tainted for life for playing the key role in suppressing the Naxal movement of the 1960s and early ’70s. Naxalites like Azizul Haque, who were subjected to third-degree police torture, became celebrities in West Bengal.
Similar trends are visible with respect to the recent spate of Islamic and Left-wing extremism terror. There were many newspaper articles on violation of human rights against TADA or UAPA accused. Celebrity writers took the side of armed Maoists and slammed the government for rights violation.
Newspapers carried human interest stories on those freed by the court from terror charges, both Islamic and Left-wing extremism, after years of trial.
These are all facts before us. The question is simple, why so many are now doing value judgement of Sadhvi and in public? Why intellectuals are singling her out? Why newspapers are not as sympathetic to her as they are to another terror accused released due to lack of proof?
If what we are doing is correct, then all those freed by the court from terror charges should also suffer social ostracism.
This is not the first time that someone accused of serious crimes, is fighting election. Fodder scam accused Lalu Yadav became rail minister in UPA government. An important minister of the Left Front government in West Bengal was accused of killing male members of an entire family, in broad daylight.
These are just two references from a mountain of instances created over the last 70 years. And, we are not referring to the list of people who enjoyed positions of power despite being accused in 1984 anti-Sikh riot.
I have no sympathy for terror. But please remember that the debauchery of the UPA on Godhra train-burning incident allowed many to justify the post-Godhra riots. 
The law should have been impartial to criminals on either side. The reverse happened. Political, intellectual and media attention was focused on Post-Godhra riot. The killers of Godhra were allowed to roam free, till Modi came to power in Delhi in 2014.
Railways, then under Lalu Yadav, instituted a judicial probe. It indicated that the railway coach was caught fire from a stove!!!  Shouldn’t we give some credit to nearly one billion Hindus in this country for limiting their anger to the ballot box?
Do we realise the reasons behind the current Hindu consolidation? If we are interested to address the issue; then we must stop taking partisan view. If Praggya is proved guilty, let her rot in the jail. But till then, she deserves the same treatment as others in her position got.
The whole problem started with discriminatory outlook some 30 years ago when Rajiv Gandhi blatantly reserved a court order against the abominable practice of Talaq through Constitutional Amendment – all for votes. A political force used the public anger – also for votes.
Any discrimination between the two will widen the rift.  

***
Tweet: @pratimbose