Tuesday 28 May 2019

Verdict2019: Modi changed the political narrative of India once again


Pratim Ranjan Bose

For a student of Indian politics, the Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s speech before the newly elected 353 MPs of the BJP-led NDA (National Democratic Alliance), at the Central Hall of the Parliament, on May 25; should be of archival value.
Because it gives a complete outline of why the government was returned to power with a historic, the responsibilities ahead, and why it is of utmost importance for this government to succeed, so as to restore the faith of voters on the political class.
“Until now elections were kind of a contract system where voters used to pick up someone to run the country and replaced him at the slightest pretext. This has been replaced by a relationship of trust,” the Prime Minister said.
He is indeed correct.
Having crossed 72 years, India’s electoral democracy is now matured. From the post-Independence euphoria, the tumults 1960’s and 1970’s, marked by a series of wars and abject poverty; to the days of coalition politics and weak governments at the Centre and the return of a strong Central government in 2014; Indian voters have tasted it all.
During this long journey, they saw the political narrative changing time and again. The fall of Indira Gandhi in 1977, in the hands of Janata Party – an amalgam of anti-Emergency forces – shifted the power balance from the Centre to the States, giving rise to regional forces.
Rajiv Gandhi misused the huge mandate in stoking the religious fire. In 1985, he amended the law to reverse a Supreme Court order for payment of alimony to the repudiated wife, overruling Muslim personal law. Later, he opened the locks of the Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid bringing religious divide out in the open. 
The short-lived V P Singh government divided Hindu votes along the caste lines. This, coupled with the rising aspirations of the post-Liberalisation (1991) period, triggered an era of coalition politics at the Centre, which was broken in 2014 with the arrival of Narendra Modi.
Looking back there were broadly two factors behind Modi’s rise.
First: the unrelenting criticism of Modi for the post-Godhra (where 59 Hindu pilgrims were burnt alive in a train) riot, in Gujarat, despite being cleared of all charges by the courts. The political attack on him became sharper, as Modi proved to be one of the finest Chief Ministers of his time. A section of Hindus felt he was persecuted.
Second:  Modi used the focused attention of the Congress-led coalition and other Left-socialist forces to hog the limelight and project himself as a strong, incorruptible leader who could steer the nation to growth in the face of any adversity
He changed the political narrative of the country in 2014 riding on these factors. For the first time since 1989, the caste barriers were broken. Not only Hindus, but even a small section of Muslims voted him to power in the hope of a corruption-free strong government.
Did Modi live up to his promises?
The proof lies in the pudding. Barring some exceptions, he had been BJP’s vote machine over the last five years and in 2019 election, which took the shape of a referendum on Modi; he improved his tally. All caste and religious equations of a fell flat as BJP increased both vote and seat share against a near-unified Opposition.
What is the reason behind the stupendous success? Why did Indian media fail to gauge the public mood? Is it due to the religious divide, as the Left-liberal elites allege? The answer lies in the changed narrative.
Don’t forget that if religious divide held the key to success in India; then BJP should have come to power in 1989 and 1991, 1996 etc. The Atal Bihari Vajpayee-led a minority government to power in 1998.
Don’t forget either that despite having majority, Modi left it on court to decide on controversial issues ranging from Ram Mandir to Article 370; and focused his attention on offering cooking gas, electricity to the poor; pushing development agenda, building roads, taking decisions like tax reforms or arms purchase which were pending for decades.
The most important thing that Modi did was instilling a sense of pride among Indians. Elites may not like it, but his call to give it back to the terrorists was well received by the common Indians who were tired of living in constant fear of terror for the last 40 years.
India is a vast country with varied expectations. Modi touched them all. Some were benefitted bu direct benefit transfer or financial inclusion or cheap healthcare programme. Some more were drawn into the start-up rush.
Some rich industrialists are negatively affected as Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code allowed Banks to forcefully recover their dues.
The relationship was not based on the government dole. Many forget that here came a leader at whose call, 1.25 crore prosperous Indians gave up their cooking gas subsidy.
The air strike on terrorist hideouts in Pakistan may be an icing on the cake, but that’s not all and sundry about Modi’s popularity. He is successful in gaining the trust of people. And the Opposition made the mistake of suspecting that in the 2019 election. Voters made an extra effort to see Modi winning.
Normally negative voting leads to high polling percentage. But this year rush to elect Modi saw polling percentages reaching an all-time high.
Modi now has to live up to the expectation he himself created. And, rest assured it wouldn’t be an easy task. In the first term, people pardoned him for failures, if any.
In the second term he will have less excuses.  People will expect take the country to an unprecedented height, which will be a challenge in the current global atmosphere. Modi is fully aware of it and he outlined the task ahead in his very first speech.

***


Tuesday 21 May 2019

EVM controversy a ploy to invite 'foren' interference to survive possible post-election trauma?


Pratim Ranjan Bose

EVM or electronic voting machine is not new in India. It replaced ballot paper and everyone was happy or content about it till a few years ago, when Narendra Modi started winning election after election excepting a few blips or slips, as in Bihar in 2015.
I know some people will immediately point at Karnataka, MP, Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan but, that would be foolish.
If we look closely, BJP actually did way better than expected in both Karnataka and Rajasthan. They had a poor chief ministerial choice in Karnataka when compared to young and energetic Chief Minister Siddharamaiah of Congress. There was no major anti-incumbency against the Siddharamaiah government either. Yet BJP emerged as the single largest party and Congress had to form a government through the backdoor. 
Similarly, Rajasthan has a tradition of changing the government in five years and Vijay Raje Scindia became unpopular. A washout was the most expected outcome of the election but it didn’t happen so. Congress scraped through.
 In MP and Chhattisgarh, BJP was in power for too long. In terms of vote share, BJP is still the largest in MP. The concern if any was the erosion of support base among the tribals in Chhattisgarh.
 What is surprising is that the EVM controversy peaked during these assembly elections. The opposition started demanding return of paper ballots, which were ideal for rigging. But the claim evaporated after the Opposition formed governments in Chhattisgarh, MP and Rajasthan.
The controversy made a come-back over the last few days, after the exit poll estimates were out on May 19, with the opposition alleging mass hacking of EVMs. Video clips started circulating. A not-so-reputable foreign news source (they are the innovators of “chequebook journalism”, “embedded journalism”, as you know) put up a report. And, enlightened individuals best described by the phrase “Luiten’s” started tweeting such clips.
But why?

An absurd allegation
I spoke to senior politicians in the Opposition and very senior bureaucrats in at least two non-BJP states. There appears to be little doubt about the absurdity of the claim. And for reason.
As we all know EVM is a standalone device that is not connected to the web. The machines with 14 voting slots each, are procured from State-owned companies and kept in the custody of the State authorities in the run-up of the election.
The names of the candidate are inserted only after the completion of the nomination process. It means attempts to tamper the machine before that is of no use. If that’s not enough, any mass tampering is impossible for the simple fact that the names of the candidates appear in alphabetical order and that varies from constituency to constituency.
After the candidate names are put into the slot, the EVM is physically sealed by both EC and the candidates. The seal is broken only at the booth, after due checking by the political parties, and mock polling takes place at the booth to ensure that the EVM is perfectly working and votes are going to the desired destination.
After the polling is over, the EVMs are sealed again (in each step candidates use their own seal along with the seal of the election officials) and in the presence of nominated representatives the respective parties. From here till the journey to the strong-room, the EVM remains under the constant watch of parties in the fray.
The Strong-room not only remains under lock and key. But even the keyhole of the lock is sealed by all. While the strong-room is guarded by central forces, each candidate is entitled to nominate one person to guard the strong-room till the day of the counting, when again the seal is broken in the presence and consensus of all parties involved.
The procedure is so set, that election officials have no discretionary power and the politics become a party to the safety of the EVM. No election official can enter the strong-room without the knowledge of the parties, leave alone taking them away and replacing them, as is suggested by Some Opposition parties and actively propagated by a section of media.
What I am saying is no classified information. Ask your friendly bureaucrat, who conducted an election, or any sensible political leader, in private, and he will tell you charges leveled are absurd. The reserve EVMs (which are kept in stock for possible use during an emergency) are transferred in open trucks etc, not the ones holding the clue to the next government. That’s exactly why there was never any controversy about EVMs.
So why are they making noise now? Some say Modi made EC a puppet. Assuming he did, we need proof. In BJP ruled Tripura (two seats) EC postponed the election in one constituency, and ordered re-poll in nearly 15% booths in the other – in the face of allegations of rigging by the BJP. It was big news, but barely covered in the national media. However, there were reports of seizure of cash from BJP workers. If EC was lax on BJP, how did you get those reports?
At the same time, there is ample proof of Opposition-ruled States, like West Bengal, not only trying to browbeat EC but leaving no stone unturned to prevent the set democratic norms. There are dozens of examples of district administrations of West Bengal denying permission to the Prime Minister and his senior colleagues from BJP to hold rallies or land helicopter. Was it a democratic approach? Why the now-removed home secretary of West Bengal wanted to stop the use of central forces in the election?
Allegations against EC’s integrity and independence are not new. In 2006, when EC ordered a six-phase Assembly election in West Bengal, the then Left Front government saw a conspiracy. In the end, Left won that election by a historic margin.

Ploy to invite global pressure?
But why the Opposition led by Congress is making such absurd allegations? Is it a simple case of finding a scapegoat for their anticipated failure? I see a bigger plot behind.
It is well known that this election is a make or break for either side. The rise of Modi is a unique in Indian political history. What the entire Opposition did to Indira Gandhi in 1977; Modi did it alone. He was never a preferred choice of BJP as the prime ministerial candidate. He made himself indispensable to BJP. And, having taken the country by storm, he challenged the prevailing political narrative. This was as good as questioning the viability of the existing political class. Naturally, Modi is a common enemy of many.
And, as they didn’t leave any stone unturned to challenge Modi’s supremacy; Modi too picked-up his targets. It’s a ruthless power game and, this election will decide who is going to face the music. Those standing on a weak wicket might, therefore, be looking forward to involving a third party – global pressure on Modi at the pretext of what they call “rigged election”.
Who is going to have the last laugh, will be clear in the next 48 hours. But, the only casualty in this war is national pride. 
Over the last 25 years; we really created a fine institution in the Election Commission, despite sufficient efforts to curb its power. Do you remember which government converted EC into a three-member panel, so as to curb the powers of the maverick Chief Election Commissioner T N Seshan?

***
Tweet: @pratimbose