Pratim Ranjan Bose
(An edited version of this blogpost was carried by Financial Express, Dhaka on September 24, 2016.)
This is bad. I didn’t write blog for three months. Surely I wasn’t idling around. May be I was too busy with too many projects or problems in hand. But the bottom line is, I failed at least on this occasion, blog writing. And that’s exactly the case with the Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
This is bad. I didn’t write blog for three months. Surely I wasn’t idling around. May be I was too busy with too many projects or problems in hand. But the bottom line is, I failed at least on this occasion, blog writing. And that’s exactly the case with the Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
The parallel is
contextual. Ever since, he has assumed power, nearly two and a half years ago,
Modi’s NDA government is working tirelessly to tie too many loose ends in the
system, left behind by his predecessor, Manmohan Singh of UPA but, he had
failed to turn the wheel of investment.
Financial Express, Dhaka on September 24, 2016 |
No grenfield
investment
Except some
mergers and acquisitions, mobile handset assembling, and a host of promises
especially from a over-leveraged infrastructure major, there is a near complete
pause in private greenfield
investment in the economy that is so crucial to lift the industrial production
and employment numbers.
As in July the
industrial growth was down to 2.1 per cent, almost half of the same period in
the previous year. Electricity is selling at exchanges merely Rs 1.5 a unit (round-the-clock
average) or 2 US cents, that doesn’t even recover the converting coal into
power. Naturally, coal demand remained flat during the April-August
period.
Some estimates say
20 per cent of the country’s cement manufacturing capacity is unutilized but my
guess is capacity utilization is ruling lower. The situation is no better with
the steel sector that finds it hard to survive a huge overcapacity in China and the
resulting cheap imports.
After imposition
of safeguard duty (for HR coils) and minimum import price (for long) price
realization of flat products increased last month. But the prices are still not
enough to make profits. But long product price realization is down and thr
producers are staring at higher losses this year.
Screen shot: Financial Express Dhaka, September 24, 201 |
The scene is a few
times worse in China .
But they operate on a larger scale and has the comfort of sitting on a cash
pile created during the three decade long robust export growth. On the
contrary, India had a $118
billion trade deficit in 2015-16, nearly half of it is with China .
And, that tells
you a story about years of failure in pushing manufacturing growth (and hyping
the consumption led growth) which is not easy to recover.
Work-in
progress
The efforts taken
by Modi started yielding results in many areas.
A BusinessLinestudy says mobile handset manufacturing for example has doubled in last twoyears. Strict imposition of domestic sourcing quota triggered movement among foreign
military hardware producers to set up base in India .
Systemic hazards
created by the previous government in pushing the road infrastructure sector
are cleared. Highway construction has started moving again this fiscal.
Earthmover equipment industry reports a pick-up in demand in January-June
period after a gap of nearly four years. But it is yet to touch 2011
high.
To create momentum
the government is pushing the State-owned companies in investing unutilized
cash in asset creation. Some of them like Coal India which was sitting on a
pile of idle cash was forced to share the booty with the owner to help
implementation of infrastructure projects (many or most of which were initiated
by the first BJP-led government during 1998-2004 and were allowed to rot
by the UPA), on a mission mode.
The changing
geopolitics required the government to put up a strong image beyond the
national boundaries. It has gone on high spending mode in creating
infrastructure - especially road, port, rail and power infrastructure - in Bhutan , Bangladesh ,
India , Nepal sub-region and the CLMV (Cambodia , Laos ,
Myanmar , Vietnam ) and, West and central Asia .
Once again many of
these proposals were initiated a decade ago and UPA lacked the enthusiasm in
implementing it, impacting India ’s
image. It is no splurge either. In the prevailing situation, it is a dire
necessity or India ’s
growth aspirations will be tamed forever.
Moreover, a good
part of this spend is actually creating demand for Indian industry. The Garden
Reach Shipbuilders (GRSE), in Kolkata, for example, is making hay on orders
from Vietnam
navy utilising Indian line of credit. Similarly, the push for rail/road
connectivity with Bangladesh
is creating demand for Indian infrastructure sector.
The push for
Chabahar port (Iran )
construction or the participation in North-South multi-modal corridor
connecting Bandar Abbas (Iran )
with St Petersburg (Russia )
is bound to expand India ’s
trade map to vast parts of central Asia .
The moot point is
all these initiatives, coupled with path-breaking tax reforms (Goods and
services tax) - which was in discussion mode since 2000 – coupled with the
corruption-free image of the government (in contrast to a corruption-ridden
UPA) should create new growth opportunities for Indian industry.
Urgent
remedy required
The problem is
common voters have little interest in long-term remedies, more so when Modi
himself fuelled their aspiration by promising Achhe Din round the corner and,
they may now get restless.
In a democracy
ridden with regionalism or fiefdoms, long-term vision is often sacrificed for
short-term gains. We have seen that in the unceremonious exits of two of the
best governments in last 25 years, one was led by P V Narasimha Rao of Congress
and the other by Atal Bihari Vajpayee.
Rao was an ardent
follower of the great Chinese leader Den Xiaoping and brought the country
economic freedom. Except for a GST, he was the architect of a majority of the
broad-spectrum reforms that the country witnessed so far. To me, he is the
father of a modern India .
Vajpayee pursued
Rao’s dream to the maximum extent. If we have any world class infrastructure
today in road, port and power sector, the credit goes to him. I don’t think any
other Prime Minister realised the importance of connectivity - right from the
village, inter-state to international levels - better than him. Be it rural
roads or the India-Myanmar-Thailand
Trilateral Highway connecting ASEAN, he
contributed the most in making India
a geopolitical rival of China .
Yet he didn’t get
a second chance. And, that’s democracy, or Indian democracy, unfortunately.
Modi may keep that in mind and think of confidence-building among the cash-rich
industrial houses in India .
***