Thursday 25 April 2024

Modi’s confident steps in foreign policy & India’s increasing security outreach

             Pratim Ranjan Bose

 It is election time in India. Political parties are busy in hectic campaigning ignoring sweltering heat. Foreign affairs and geopolitics are not part of the debate. 


This is partly logical; partly a hangover of the closed-economy era; and partly, a failure of the Opposition politics to recognise national good. Sad but true, the Opposition failed to recognise the global challenge posed by the pandemic; the post-pandemic unravelling of the world order and; India's achievements.  

Traditionally, the popular discourse on foreign policy in India revolved around Pakistan and the USA. This time both are absent from the election debate but, for different reasons. 

 

Indians learnt to ignore Pakistan

India-Pakistan rivalry has its roots in the religion-based Partition in 1947. The series of wars and terror attacks – particularly the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack of 2008 – strengthened the perception of an ‘enemy state’ across the border. 

However, the sustained rise in India’s economic and political clout over the last decade under Narendra Modi vis-à-vis the meltdown of Pakistan, brought welcome changes in Indian mindset.

The Balakot airstrike (in response to Pulwama terror attack), ignoring the nuclear deterrents; abrogation of Article 370 from Kashmir and; a parallel drop in terror attacks across India, brought soothing effects. 

Indians, now confident, learnt to ignore Pakistan. Ideally, that should pave the way for future cooperation between the two nations. However, the domestic politics of Pakistan may not agree with that. 

The anti-USA sentiments were clearly a gift of the Leftist-Socialist grip on policymaking both before and after the economic Liberalisation (1991). 

The highly favourable India-USA civil nuclear deal entered by the Manmohan Singh government, in 2008, ignoring stiff opposition from the Left, marked the first major deviation. 

Left paid a huge price for withdrawing support from the Manmohan Singh government. Today, they are relevant only to the state politics of Kerala. 

In West Bengal - where they were in power for 34 years, from 1977 to 2011; the Left vote share reduced from 45% to 2%. Yesterday’s ruler does not have a single seat in the Bengal assembly. 

 

No political sensitivity about Indo-US

India-US relations improved manifold under Modi. Both the Donald Trump and the incumbent Joe Biden administrations in the US contributed significantly to it. 

Military logistics deal between the two nations in 2016 to India’s mega commercial aircraft purchase order to Boeing; the US Congress’s approval to GE Aerospace for manufacturing fighter jet engines in India; MoU for semiconductor supply chain etc - the relationships between the two nations became muti-dimensional. 

The US participation is crucial for the proposed India Middle-East Economic Corridor. India participated in the US-led four-nation QUAD and Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF). Indo-Pacific is a priority to the US and, India is playing a critical role on that front. 

At a recent podcast with me, India’s former foreign secretary Shri Harsh Vardhan Shringla said the bilateral relationship is now above political changes in either nation. The link of the podcast is available here

 

Independent foreign policy

The striking fact is, that India chose the US as a strategic partner and, maintained its policy neutrality as well. 

India’s stance in favour of buying Russian crude ignoring the US sanction and; the recent rebuttal to both Germany and the US for poking their nose in our internal affairs; are classic examples. 

The diplomatic row with the USA’s closest ally Canada, is another fitting example of India’s independent foreign policy. 

The policy neutrality is also visible in India-China relations.

India recognizes China’s economic prowess. Delhi participates in forums like SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organisation) and BRICS with China. But at the same time, India has deployed additional troops on the border to prevent Beijing from ‘salami slicing’ Indian territory.

Politics and economics are complementary in nature. 

The neo-liberal thought had put economics in the driving seat. China focused on building its economic might between 1978 and 2008 before flexing the political muscle. India failed to grow at the same rate as China in the past, and maintained a low profile in international politics. 

Such policies are ineffective in the post-pandemic era, where the post-USSR unipolar world order is collapsing. In the changed circumstances, countries should be politically powerful to make economic gains and vice-versa. 

Modi realised the potential and pushed India into a high-stakes game. This is clearly visible on the security front, where India has now started taking leadership roles. 

 

Changing security paradigm

The Indian Navy deployed one ship in the Gulf of Aden as part of a multi-nation anti-piracy taskforce since October 2008. 

The shift came in December 2023, following a drone attack on a vessel carrying crude for an Indian refinery. Delhi immediately pressed three warships and allied assets, into service in the international waters in the western Arabian Sea.  

India’s unilateral steps helped improve the security of maritime traffic through the Gulf of Aden. 

This was parallel to Delhi’s rapid expansion of naval capacity in the Indian Ocean. The Andamans and the Lakshadweep Islands are witnessing a dramatic escalation in naval infrastructure and operations. 

The Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean are India’s backyards. Whatever Delhi is doing now can be read as a delayed response to Chinese advances. However, the South China Sea was an exclusive Chinese domain. 

Over the last decade, every country in the South China Sea reported violations of maritime borders by Beijing. The Philippines was an old US ally. Under former President, Rodrigo Duterte, Manila nearly dumped the US for China. 

India was barely there in the South China Sea till 2022 when it entered an agreement with the Philippines to sell medium-range, supersonic BrahMos missiles. 

The very next year, in 2023, Delhi recognised the 2016 award of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea Tribunal in favour of Manila’s claim over a disputed territory in the sea. Beijing refused to accept the international award and kept targeting the Philippine armed forces.  

BrahMos is produced by an Indo-Soviet joint venture and can be launched from land, sea and air. The first batch of missiles are delivered in April 2024. Manila will deploy them to stop the Chinese. 

 

Raiding the South China Sea

The tides have turned in the South China Sea. Last year, Manila announced an exit from China’s Belt and Road. President Biden recently established a trilateral axis with Japan and the Philippines. 

Similar to the Chinese challenge in India’s backyard; Beijing is now challenged in its backyard. And, India is playing a role in it. 

You may listen to my latest podcast with the Manila-based geopolitical analyst Don McLain Gill, for more insights into the shift in Indian strategy. Watch the podcast here

 

 

Wednesday 3 April 2024

India's transformation to a no-nonsense democracy

Pratim Ranjan Bose


In his 10-year rule, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has done much good for the country. 


Mega tax reforms, unprecedented focus on infrastructure and defence strategic sectors, dramatic push to digitisation, make-in-India, fast-forwarding defence hardware and space research programmes, energy transition, and start-up revolution are part of that list. 

  However, to my mind, the biggest change has come in the way India has conducted its business both internally and externally over the last decade. 

From my three-decade-long experience in tracking India’s policy-making and policy implementation, I can tell, that this is the first government that truly delivered. 

It does not mean that all policies were equally effective. What has essentially changed is the pace of making policy decisions and time-bound delivery. 

Together they made the BJP government far more accountable and trustworthy, which is reflected in its astounding electoral success. 

 

Marked Change

This is a marked change from the past when India was referred to by top editors and policy analysts across South and South East Asia as “a nation that talks.” 

I shared the podium with them in many international seminars. The criticism was not pleasing. However, there was not much way to counter it. 

Leaving aside her international commitments, India was a miserable failure in implementing projects even at home. Who would trust a nation that once didn’t have enough toilets? 

India took 20 years to build a strategic bridge in Assam; sat on the plan to build a dedicated rail freight corridor for years and; helplessly watched anarchic forces chasing away foreign direct investment (FDI) from Odisha in the name of green protests and civil rights. 

Thankfully, that era of non-performance is finally behind us. Any realistic assessment will prove that India’s policy implementation rate - be it in rural electrification or taking piped drinking water to rural households - is at par with the best in the world. 

During the pandemic, Modi promised to bring out homemade COVID vaccines for 140 crore people and, he did. Naturally, when he promises to make India a semiconductor hub in five years, everyone takes him seriously. 

 

Non-nonsense democracy

That takes us to Modi’s second contribution. 

Over the last 10 years, he has been successful in pushing forward the idea of a no-nonsense democracy where the government cannot be taken for a ride. Modi wants his government to be taken seriously, both in and outside India.

Internally, that brought a paradigm shift from the coalition-era experience - particularly during the Congress-led UPA rule between 2004 and 2014 - that gave rise to mobocracy, indiscipline and anarchy.

The recent arrest of Arvind Kejriwal, Chief Minister of the Union territory of Delhi for money laundering and; a huge Rs 135 crore or USD 16 million income tax recovery from Congress alongside fresh demands of over Rs 3000 crore; are perfect examples of the changed fundamentals in Indian democracy. 

Both actions have taken place following due and prolonged legal procedures. According to CNBC[i], Kejriwal ignored at least six summons from law enforcers since October 2023 to cooperate with the probe and took recourse to rhetorical politics. 

Kejriwal thought that the Modi government would not dare to take punitive action against him, ahead of the general election. He was proved wrong. Kejriwal was arrested on March 21. 

A division bench of the Delhi High Court first removed his constitutional protection from arrest. On April 1, he was ordered[i] 14-day judicial custody. Kejriwal’s Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government in Delhi is now in serious trouble. 

Congress[ii] was equally brazen in its attempt to take the system for a ride. The party lost income tax exemption in 2018-19 due to extensive use of cash in the electoral process. 

India Today[iii] writes: The IT Department served its first notice to the Congress claiming a tax outstanding of Rs 105 crore on July 6, 2021. However, no response was received. 

A follow-up notice was issued on October 28, 2021, offering the party an option to settle 20% of the outstanding amount. Congress ignored it too. 

In the fiscal year 2021-22, the IT Commissioner dismissed the Congress's appeal against the IT Department's notice. Further notices issued by the department in 2023 were also essentially ignored. 

In May 2023, the party appealed against the IT Commissioner's decision in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). 

Congress lost the appeal in ITAT and moved to a division bench of the Delhi High Court that upheld the order of the Appellate Tribunal. The court had rightly blamed Congress for “sleeping[iv]” on the three-year-old claim.  

Congress and AAP are now blaming Modi for the “murder of democracy.” Rahul Gandhi of Congress went a step ahead in threatening[v] officials of punitive action[vi] whenever his party returns to power. 

Is Rahul Gandhi speaking in the language of democracy? 

 

Remote control will not work

Some foreign powers - namely Germany and the USA[vii] - came in support of Kejriwal and Congress and, went back home with an earful. 

Washington Post[viii] writes: “U.S. and German officials issued public statements gently reminding India about the importance of the rule of law. The response from New Delhi was anything but gentle.” 

The Indian foreign ministry immediately summoned German and U.S. diplomats for a dressing-down. It lashed out at Washington for “casting aspersions” and making “completely unacceptable” comments about India’s internal affairs.  

According to the American newspaper, “It reflected the tough new brand of diplomacy embraced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and cheered by his nationalist supporters.”

The truth is, any well-meaning Indian would support the emergence of a strong state that would not give in to undue pressures from outside or inside. 

 

***

 

  [i] https://www.barandbench.com/news/delhi-court-sends-arvind-kejriwal-judicial-custody-april-15

[ii] https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/recovery-of-rs-135-crore-from-congress-as-per-income-tax-laws-report-5335604

[iii] https://www.indiatoday.in/law/story/income-tax-department-case-against-indian-national-congress-comprehensive-breakdown-2505890-2024-02-22

[iv] https://www.livemint.com/politics/news/delhi-hc-dismisses-congress-plea-seeking-stay-of-income-tax-notice-for-recovery-of-over-rs-105-cr-11710322041874.html

[v] https://x.com/RahulGandhi/status/1773663481679458688?s=20 

[vi] https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/strict-action-against-those-trying-to-murder-the-democracy-rahul-gandhis-guarantee-after-congress-gets-i-t-notices/articleshow/108880553.cms?from=mdr

[vii] https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/us-speaks-again-on-arvind-kejriwal-mentions-frozen-congress-accounts-5324508

[viii] https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/03/29/india-us-criticism-kejriwal/

 

Wednesday 27 March 2024

Opposition unity for Arvind Kejriwal may be temporary

             Pratim Ranjan Bose

Last week was eventful in Indian politics. Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi and supremo of Aam Aadmi Party or AAP has landed up in jail in a multi-billion-dollar kickback scam involving the liquor distribution policy. 


            

The arrest of Chief Ministers and ministers for corruption charges is not new to India. In 2014, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalitha was arrested in a disproportionate asset case.  

Lalu Yadav of RJD in Bihar handed over the Chief ministership to his wife in 1997 and enjoyed power from behind after a federal agency accused him of fodder scam. He was eventually arrested. 

Hemant Soren from Jharkhand stepped down earlier this year anticipating arrest. Madhu Koda also from Jharkhand was arrested in 2009 within months of relegating power.

However, Kejriwal’s arrest was distinct. 

 

Firstly, the timing. He was arrested on March 21, after the announcement of the general election on March 16. 

The arrest did not come easy. The probe has been on since August 2022. Delhi’s Deputy Chief Minister was arrested for the scam in March 2023. 

According to CNBC[i], Kejriwal ignored at least six summons from law enforcers since October 2023 to cooperate with the probe. He ignored each of them and even questioned the authority of the agency in summoning him. 

Finally, the Delhi High Court checked the evidence in the hands of the investigating agency and denied him immunity[ii] from arrest. 

The Opposition, led by Congress - which is barely in competition against the ruling BJP in the ensuing election - expressed solidarity with Kejriwal. However, for more reasons than one, the support may be temporary or superficial. 

Firstly, Kejriwal came to prominence during Anna Hazare’s movement against corruption in 2011. AAP was formed in 2012. 

And, since its birth, AAP was at loggerheads with Congress which was then ruling the union territory of Delhi. Kejriwal promised to send the then Delhi Chief Minister Late Sheila Dixit to jail. 

He publicly accused Sonia Gandhi, the ultimate power centre in Congress, of corruption and dared the federal agencies to arrest her. 

It was AAP that dislodged the Congress government in Punjab in 2022. 

In 2016, former Congress Chief Minister of Punjab Captain Amarinder Singh[iii] accused the Delhi CM of taking suspicious funding from the US for his non-profit organisation. 

In December 2022, Congress lodged a formal complaint to law enforcers seeking a probe into the liquor scam. 

 And, most critically, AAP was a spoiler to Congress’s recent effort to unite opposition parties under a grand coalition for the 2024 election. 

 

Second, the Opposition unity on Kejriwal’s arrest is also questionable due to the depth of the scam that cuts across the business and political spectrum. 

K Kavitha, daughter of former Telangana Chief Minister K Chandrasekhar Rao from BRS is also arrested in the scam. 

According to a report in The New Indian Express[iv] on March 24, Kavita was allegedly mediating between Kejriwal government and politically influential liquor barons from South India for taking advantage of the Delhi liquor policy. 

Some of the businessmen already turned approver[v] to the law enforcement agency probing the money laundering scam. One such businessman, who admitted offering kickback through Kavita, recently joined TDP of Andhra Pradesh. 

Media is speculating if Kavita will also turn an approver. 

 

Thirdly, just as “Pakistan is not a normal country,” Kejriwal and his AAP are not regular political entities. 

In an editorial published on March 23 - that is after the arrest of the Delhi CM - anti-BJP newspaper, The Hindu[vi] reminded that Kejriwal and his “band of anarchists” rose to national prominence by giving precedence to “mobocracy."

Both Congress and BJP accused Kejriwal and his AAP, time and again, directly or indirectly, of giving precedence to anarchy or supporting anarchic forces. 

The allegation took a serious turn on March 25, when exiled Khalistani terrorist, Gurpatwant Singh Pannun claimed[vii] that Khalistani groups provided nearly $16 million to AAP between 2014 and 2022. The report was carried in all prominent Indian newspapers. 

 

Notably, such groups have strong media networks in the West. Seen from this perspective, the sympathy wave in the Western media and, the sharp reaction of German foreign ministry, might have further ruined Kejriwal’s case. India slammed[viii] Germany for poking their nose in our internal affairs. 

Clearly, Kejriwal’s arrest may have more than it meets the eye. 


***

  [i] https://www.cnbctv18.com/india/delhi-excise-policy-case-timeline-of-key-events-leading-to-cm-arvind-kejriwal-arrest-19345501.htm

[ii] https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-refuses-to-grant-interim-protection-from-ed-arrest-to-cm-arvind-kejriwal-in-liquor-policy-case-253041

[iii] https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/arvind-kejriwal-ngo-cia-amarinder-singh-sikh-chhotepur-337574-2016-08-27

[iv] https://www.newindianexpress.com/explainers/2024/Mar/24/where-brs-leader-kavitha-figures-in-the-delhi-liquor-scam

[v] https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/how-sarath-reddy-turning-approver-in-delhi-liquor-scam-will-impact-kcrs-daughter-kavitha-2387982-2023-06-02

[vi] https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/aap-trap-on-arvind-kejriwals-arrest-and-democracy/article67981526.ece

[vii] https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/khalistani-separatist-leader-gurpatwant-pannun-alleges-aap-and-arvind-kejriwal-of-receiving-rs-134-crore-from-the-group/articleshow/108763738.cms?from=mdr

[viii] https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/why-india-slammed-germany-over-comments-on-arvind-kejriwals-arrest-5300230